Statizoid

Legislation on sexual harassment in employment in Malaysia

Malaysia: Legislation on sexual harassment in employment was 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
1 (1=yes; 0=no)
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
1 (1=yes; 0=no)
in 2012
All-time low
0 (1=yes; 0=no)
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023

Legislation on sexual harassment in employment in Malaysia, 1970–2023

00.20.40.60.81197019962023

Source: Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in (1=yes; 0=no).

Analysis

In 2023, legislation on sexual harassment in employment in Malaysia stood at 1 (1=yes; 0=no). That is the highest value across all 54 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, legislation on sexual harassment in employment in Malaysia peaked at 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0 (1=yes; 0=no), in 1970.

That places Malaysia 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2023, putting it in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Legislation on sexual harassment in employment in Malaysia, year by year

Year (1=yes; 0=no) Change
1970 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1971 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1972 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1973 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1974 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1975 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1976 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1977 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1978 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1979 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1980 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1981 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1982 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1983 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1984 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1985 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1986 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1987 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1988 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1989 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1990 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1991 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1992 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1993 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1994 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1995 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1996 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1997 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1998 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1999 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2000 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2001 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2002 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2003 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2004 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2005 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2006 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2007 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2008 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2009 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2010 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2011 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2012 1 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2013 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2014 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2015 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2016 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2017 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2018 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2019 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2020 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2021 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2022 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2023 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%

Malaysia compared with similar countries

  • Malaysia's 1 (1=yes; 0=no) is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 1 (1=yes; 0=no), 1.0× the median. (55 countries reporting)
  • Malaysia's 1 (1=yes; 0=no) is above the median for East Asia & Pacific, which is 1 (1=yes; 0=no), 1.0× the median. (28 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
1980s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
1990s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
2000s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
2010s 0.8 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
2020s 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 4

Countries ranked near Malaysia

  1. 1 Afghanistan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  2. 1 Albania 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  3. 1 Algeria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  4. 1 Angola 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  5. 1 Argentina 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  6. 1 Armenia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  7. 1 Australia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  8. 1 Austria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  9. 1 Azerbaijan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  10. 1 Bahamas 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  11. 1 Bahrain 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  12. 1 Bangladesh 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  13. 1 Barbados 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  14. 1 Belgium 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  15. 1 Belize 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  16. 1 Benin 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  17. 1 Bhutan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  18. 1 Bolivia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  19. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  20. 1 Brazil 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  21. 1 Bulgaria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  22. 1 Burkina Faso 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  23. 1 Burundi 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  24. 1 Cambodia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  25. 1 Cameroon 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  26. 1 Canada 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  27. 1 Cape Verde 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  28. 1 Central African Republic 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  29. 1 Chad 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  30. 1 Chile 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  31. 1 China 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  32. 1 Colombia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  33. 1 Comoros 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  34. 1 Congo 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  35. 1 Costa Rica 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  36. 1 Cote d'Ivoire 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  37. 1 Croatia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  38. 1 Cyprus 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  39. 1 Czechia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  40. 1 Democratic Republic of Congo 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  41. 1 Denmark 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  42. 1 Djibouti 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  43. 1 Dominican Republic 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  44. 1 East Timor 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  45. 1 Ecuador 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  46. 1 Egypt 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  47. 1 El Salvador 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  48. 1 Equatorial Guinea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  49. 1 Eritrea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  50. 1 Estonia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  51. 1 Ethiopia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  52. 1 Fiji 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  53. 1 Finland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  54. 1 France 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  55. 1 Gabon 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  56. 1 Georgia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  57. 1 Germany 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  58. 1 Ghana 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  59. 1 Greece 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  60. 1 Guinea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  61. 1 Guyana 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  62. 1 Honduras 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  63. 1 Hong Kong 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  64. 1 Hungary 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  65. 1 Iceland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  66. 1 India 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  67. 1 Indonesia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  68. 1 Iraq 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  69. 1 Ireland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  70. 1 Israel 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  71. 1 Italy 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  72. 1 Jamaica 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  73. 1 Jordan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  74. 1 Kenya 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  75. 1 Kiribati 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  76. 1 Kuwait 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  77. 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  78. 1 Laos 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  79. 1 Latvia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  80. 1 Lebanon 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  81. 1 Lesotho 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  82. 1 Liberia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  83. 1 Lithuania 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  84. 1 Luxembourg 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  85. 1 Madagascar 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  86. 1 Malawi 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  87. 1 Maldives 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  88. 1 Malta 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  89. 1 Mauritius 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  90. 1 Mexico 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  91. 1 Moldova 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  92. 1 Mongolia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  93. 1 Montenegro 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  94. 1 Morocco 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  95. 1 Mozambique 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  96. 1 Namibia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  97. 1 Nepal 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  98. 1 Netherlands 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  99. 1 New Zealand 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  100. 1 Nicaragua 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  101. 1 Niger 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  102. 1 Nigeria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  103. 1 North Macedonia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  104. 1 Norway 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  105. 1 Oman 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  106. 1 Pakistan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  107. 1 Panama 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  108. 1 Paraguay 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  109. 1 Peru 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  110. 1 Philippines 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  111. 1 Poland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  112. 1 Portugal 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  113. 1 Puerto Rico 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  114. 1 Romania 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  115. 1 Rwanda 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  116. 1 Saint Lucia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  117. 1 Samoa 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  118. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  119. 1 Saudi Arabia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  120. 1 Senegal 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  121. 1 Serbia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  122. 1 Sierra Leone 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  123. 1 Singapore 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  124. 1 Slovakia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  125. 1 Slovenia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  126. 1 South Africa 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  127. 1 South Korea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  128. 1 South Sudan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  129. 1 Spain 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  130. 1 Sri Lanka 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  131. 1 Suriname 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  132. 1 Sweden 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  133. 1 Switzerland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  134. 1 Tanzania 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  135. 1 Thailand 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  136. 1 Togo 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  137. 1 Tunisia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  138. 1 Turkey 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  139. 1 Uganda 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  140. 1 Ukraine 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  141. 1 United Arab Emirates 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  142. 1 United Kingdom 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  143. 1 United States 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  144. 1 Uruguay 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  145. 1 Venezuela 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  146. 1 Vietnam 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  147. 1 Zambia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  148. 1 Zimbabwe 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More work & labour data for Malaysia

All data for Malaysia →

Frequently asked questions

What is legislation on sexual harassment in employment in Malaysia?
Legislation on sexual harassment in employment in Malaysia was 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2023, according to Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest legislation on sexual harassment in employment recorded in Malaysia?
The highest recorded value was 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2012.
What is the lowest legislation on sexual harassment in employment recorded in Malaysia?
The lowest recorded value was 0 (1=yes; 0=no) in 1970.
How does Malaysia rank for legislation on sexual harassment in employment?
Malaysia ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
Is legislation on sexual harassment in employment rising or falling in Malaysia?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Malaysia data come from?
The figures come from Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Legislation on sexual harassment in employment. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Legislation on sexual harassment in employment in Malaysia. Statizoid, drawing on Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 08 October 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/legislation-on-sexual-harassment-in-employment/malaysia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/legislation-on-sexual-harassment-in-employment/malaysia/">Legislation on sexual harassment in employment in Malaysia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Legislation on sexual harassment in employment
Unit
(1=yes; 0=no)
Source
Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 10,152 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

Legal provisions specifically protect against sexual harassment in employment, including unwelcome verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature.