Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) by country

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)

Countries reporting
27
Highest
0.4096 poorest
Moldova
Lowest
0.0024 poorest
Poland
Median
0.1776 poorest
Years covered
20
2003–2022
Data points
266

What the numbers show

Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) is currently reported for 27 countries. The highest value is 0.4096 poorest in Moldova; the lowest is 0.0024 poorest in Poland.

The median across all reporting countries is 0.1776 poorest, and the mean is 0.1845 poorest.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 174.

Over the past decade 16 countries rose and 11 fell. The largest increase was in Peru (up 222.5%), and the largest decrease in Poland (down 99.2%).

Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Moldova 0.4096 poorest 2018 up 51.6% rising
2 Kyrgyzstan 0.3668 poorest 2020 up 22.4% rising
3 Serbia 0.3397 poorest 2022 up 14.9% rising
4 Armenia 0.3369 poorest 2022 down 14.6% falling
5 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 0.2918 poorest 2017 down 10.7% falling
5 Kosovo 0.2918 poorest 2017 down 10.7% falling
7 South Africa 0.2753 poorest 2021 up 26.0% rising
8 Mexico 0.2582 poorest 2022 up 34.5% rising
9 Pakistan 0.2535 poorest 2018 down 12.6% falling
10 Vietnam 0.2267 poorest 2020 up 95.4% rising
11 Mongolia 0.2159 poorest 2020 up 38.6% falling
12 Georgia 0.2021 poorest 2021 up 126.6% rising
13 Sri Lanka 0.1892 poorest 2019 up 19.5% rising
14 Paraguay 0.1776 poorest 2022 up 25.1% rising
15 Turkey 0.1751 poorest 2019 down 7.3% falling
16 Dominican Republic 0.1566 poorest 2021 up 45.7% rising
17 Burkina Faso 0.1319 poorest 2021 up 18.4% falling
18 El Salvador 0.1174 poorest 2022 down 31.2% flat
19 Chile 0.0978 poorest 2022 up 27.5% rising
20 Costa Rica 0.0976 poorest 2022 down 24.4% falling
21 Colombia 0.0868 poorest 2022 up 23.2% volatile
22 Honduras 0.0856 poorest 2019 down 23.7% falling
23 Bolivia 0.0683 poorest 2021 up 22.8% rising
24 Peru 0.0581 poorest 2022 up 222.5% rising
25 Ecuador 0.0351 poorest 2022 down 74.7% falling
26 Uruguay 0.0332 poorest 2022 down 68.3% volatile
27 Poland 0.0024 poorest 2019 down 99.2% falling

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile by country. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-international-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-international-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/">Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest)
Unit
poorest
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)