Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Chile

Chile: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.0978 poorest in 2022. ▲ Rising

Latest (2022)
0.0978 poorest
Change on year
down 29.4%
World rank
19th
of 27 countries
All-time high
0.1732 poorest
in 2017
All-time low
0.0767 poorest
in 2011
Years of data
5
2011–2022

Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Chile, 2011–2022

00.050.10.152011201620222011: 0.077 poorest2013: 0.079 poorest2017: 0.173 poorest2020: 0.138 poorest2022: 0.098 poorest

Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.

Analysis

In 2022, benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Chile stood at 0.0978 poorest.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 29.4% on the previous year and up 27.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Chile peaked at 0.1732 poorest in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.0767 poorest, in 2011.

Chile ranks 19th of 27 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.

Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Chile, year by year

Annual values for Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) in Chile, 2011 to 2022.
Year poorest Change
2011 0.0767 poorest
2013 0.0794 poorest +3.5%
2017 0.1732 poorest +118.2%
2020 0.1385 poorest -20.1%
2022 0.0978 poorest -29.4%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2010s 0.1098 poorest 0.0767 poorest 0.1732 poorest 3
2020s 0.1181 poorest 0.0978 poorest 0.1385 poorest 2

Countries ranked near Chile

  1. 16 Dominican Republic 0.1566 poorest compare
  2. 17 Burkina Faso 0.1319 poorest compare
  3. 18 El Salvador 0.1174 poorest compare
  4. 20 Costa Rica 0.0976 poorest compare
  5. 21 Colombia 0.0868 poorest compare
  6. 22 Honduras 0.0856 poorest compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Chile

All data for Chile →

Frequently asked questions

What is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Chile?
Benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Chile was 0.0978 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Chile?
The highest recorded value was 0.1732 poorest in 2017.
What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Chile?
The lowest recorded value was 0.0767 poorest in 2011.
How does Chile rank for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile?
Chile ranks 19th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
Is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Chile?
Over the last ten years it is up 27.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
Where does this Chile data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Chile. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-international-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-international-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/chile/">Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Chile</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest)
Unit
poorest
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)