Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Uruguay
Uruguay: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.0332 poorest in 2022. ◆ Volatile
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Uruguay, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
In 2022, benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Uruguay stood at 0.0332 poorest. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
That represents a change of down 55.5% on the previous year and down 68.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Uruguay peaked at 0.3235 poorest in 2011 and was at its lowest, 0.0332 poorest, in 2022.
Uruguay ranks 26th of 27 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Uruguay, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.0647 poorest | — |
| 2009 | 0.0797 poorest | +23.2% |
| 2010 | 0.2945 poorest | +269.4% |
| 2011 | 0.3235 poorest | +9.9% |
| 2012 | 0.1045 poorest | -67.7% |
| 2015 | 0.061 poorest | -41.6% |
| 2016 | 0.06 poorest | -1.7% |
| 2017 | 0.0506 poorest | -15.6% |
| 2018 | 0.0661 poorest | +30.4% |
| 2019 | 0.0819 poorest | +24.0% |
| 2020 | 0.0516 poorest | -37.0% |
| 2021 | 0.0745 poorest | +44.4% |
| 2022 | 0.0332 poorest | -55.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0722 poorest | 0.0647 poorest | 0.0797 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.1303 poorest | 0.0506 poorest | 0.3235 poorest | 8 |
| 2020s | 0.0531 poorest | 0.0332 poorest | 0.0745 poorest | 3 |
Countries ranked near Uruguay
More work & labour data for Uruguay
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.02 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.72 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0269 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 3,567 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 95.27 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,144 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,102 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,246 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Uruguay?
- Benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Uruguay was 0.0332 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Uruguay?
- The highest recorded value was 0.3235 poorest in 2011.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Uruguay?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0332 poorest in 2022.
- How does Uruguay rank for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile?
- Uruguay ranks 26th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Uruguay?
- Over the last ten years it is down 68.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Uruguay data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)