Ecuador vs Uruguay: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile
Ecuador
0.0351 poorest
in 2022
Uruguay
0.0332 poorest
in 2022
Ecuador rank
25th
Uruguay rank
26th
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Ecuador
- Uruguay
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 0.0351 poorest against 0.0332 poorest in Uruguay, a difference of 0.0019 poorest.
That makes Ecuador's figure about 1.1 times Uruguay's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 26th of 27 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.089 poorest | 0.0647 poorest | 0.0242 poorest | Ecuador |
| 2010s | 0.0899 poorest | 0.1303 poorest | 0.0403 poorest | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.0585 poorest | 0.0531 poorest | 0.0054 poorest | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile, Ecuador or Uruguay?
- Ecuador, at 0.0351 poorest against 0.0332 poorest in Uruguay as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile between Ecuador and Uruguay?
- 0.0019 poorest, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Uruguay?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and Uruguay rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile?
- Ecuador ranks 25th and Uruguay ranks 26th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)