Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador
Ecuador: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.0351 poorest in 2022. ▼ Falling
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador is 0.0351 poorest, measured in 2022. That is the lowest value across all 13 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 66.1% on the previous year and down 74.7% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador peaked at 0.1384 poorest in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.0351 poorest, in 2022.
Ecuador ranks 25th of 27 countries on this measure, in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.089 poorest | — |
| 2010 | 0.0942 poorest | +5.9% |
| 2011 | 0.1123 poorest | +19.3% |
| 2012 | 0.1384 poorest | +23.2% |
| 2014 | 0.0651 poorest | -53.0% |
| 2015 | 0.0784 poorest | +20.5% |
| 2016 | 0.107 poorest | +36.4% |
| 2017 | 0.0765 poorest | -28.5% |
| 2018 | 0.0682 poorest | -10.9% |
| 2019 | 0.0445 poorest | -34.8% |
| 2020 | 0.0371 poorest | -16.6% |
| 2021 | 0.1034 poorest | +178.7% |
| 2022 | 0.0351 poorest | -66.1% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.089 poorest | 0.089 poorest | 0.089 poorest | 1 |
| 2010s | 0.0872 poorest | 0.0445 poorest | 0.1384 poorest | 9 |
| 2020s | 0.0585 poorest | 0.0351 poorest | 0.1034 poorest | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador?
- Benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador was 0.0351 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.1384 poorest in 2012.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0351 poorest in 2022.
- How does Ecuador rank for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile?
- Ecuador ranks 25th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 74.7%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)