Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Peru
Peru: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.0581 poorest in 2022. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Peru, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Peru is 0.0581 poorest, measured in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 25.6% on the previous year and up 222.5% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Peru peaked at 0.0781 poorest in 2021 and was at its lowest, 0.0122 poorest, in 2020.
That places Peru 24th out of 27 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 15 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile in Peru, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.0176 poorest | — |
| 2009 | 0.0306 poorest | +74.5% |
| 2010 | 0.0349 poorest | +13.9% |
| 2011 | 0.0339 poorest | -2.8% |
| 2012 | 0.018 poorest | -46.9% |
| 2013 | 0.0271 poorest | +50.3% |
| 2014 | 0.0206 poorest | -23.9% |
| 2015 | 0.0406 poorest | +97.1% |
| 2016 | 0.0408 poorest | +0.3% |
| 2017 | 0.0284 poorest | -30.4% |
| 2018 | 0.0449 poorest | +58.3% |
| 2019 | 0.0367 poorest | -18.4% |
| 2020 | 0.0122 poorest | -66.8% |
| 2021 | 0.0781 poorest | +541.1% |
| 2022 | 0.0581 poorest | -25.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0241 poorest | 0.0176 poorest | 0.0306 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.0326 poorest | 0.018 poorest | 0.0449 poorest | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.0495 poorest | 0.0122 poorest | 0.0781 poorest | 3 |
Countries ranked near Peru
More work & labour data for Peru
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.4349 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.4225 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.4473 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.29 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.6786 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 35,667 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,953 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 19,027 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 19,136 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 38,163 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Peru?
- Benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile in Peru was 0.0581 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Peru?
- The highest recorded value was 0.0781 poorest in 2021.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Peru?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.0122 poorest in 2020.
- How does Peru rank for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile?
- Peru ranks 24th out of 27 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Peru?
- Over the last ten years it is up 222.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Peru data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)