Peru vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile
Peru
0.0581 poorest
in 2022
Poland
0.0024 poorest
in 2019
Peru rank
24th
Poland rank
27th
Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Peru
- Poland
How they compare
Peru currently reports 0.0581 poorest against 0.0024 poorest in Poland, a difference of 0.0557 poorest.
That makes Peru's figure about 24.7 times Poland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Peru ranks 24th and Poland ranks 27th of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Peru | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.0241 poorest | 0.268 poorest | 0.2439 poorest | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.0333 poorest | 0.2315 poorest | 0.1982 poorest | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile, Peru or Poland?
- Peru, at 0.0581 poorest against 0.0024 poorest in Poland as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile between Peru and Poland?
- 0.0557 poorest, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Peru and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - international private transfers -1st quintile?
- Peru ranks 24th and Poland ranks 27th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - International Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in International Private Transfers programs (%)