Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban was 49.8% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan stood at 49.8%.
The figure is down 1.2% on the previous year and up 39.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 59.5% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 35.6%, in 2011.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 42.6% | — |
| 2011 | 35.6% | -16.3% |
| 2012 | 38.7% | +8.6% |
| 2013 | 45.4% | +17.3% |
| 2014 | 59.5% | +31.1% |
| 2015 | 53.0% | -11.0% |
| 2016 | 59.1% | +11.6% |
| 2017 | 55.1% | -6.8% |
| 2018 | 50.2% | -9.0% |
| 2019 | 50.4% | +0.5% |
| 2020 | 49.8% | -1.2% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 49.8% is above the median for lower middle income countries, which is 38.2%, 1.3× the median. (5 countries reporting)
- Kyrgyzstan's 49.8% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 63.0%, 79% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.6% | 42.6% | 42.6% | 1 |
| 2010s | 49.7% | 35.6% | 59.5% | 9 |
| 2020s | 49.8% | 49.8% | 49.8% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Kyrgyzstan was 49.8% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 59.5% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 35.6% in 2011.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th out of 34 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 39.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group