Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Brazil
Brazil: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban was 49.1% in 2022. ▼ Falling
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Brazil, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Brazil recorded 49.1% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in 2022.
Compared with earlier readings it is up 5.1% on the previous year and down 17.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Brazil peaked at 59.5% in 2011 and was at its lowest, 46.7%, in 2020.
Brazil ranks 12th of 34 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban in Brazil, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 55.0% | — |
| 2009 | 57.1% | +3.8% |
| 2011 | 59.5% | +4.2% |
| 2012 | 59.2% | -0.6% |
| 2015 | 58.8% | -0.7% |
| 2016 | 49.2% | -16.3% |
| 2017 | 48.6% | -1.2% |
| 2018 | 50.6% | +4.0% |
| 2019 | 50.4% | -0.5% |
| 2020 | 46.7% | -7.2% |
| 2021 | 46.7% | +0.0% |
| 2022 | 49.1% | +5.1% |
Brazil compared with similar countries
- Brazil's 49.1% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 43.6%, 1.1× the median. (22 countries reporting)
- Brazil's 49.1% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 35.3%, 1.4× the median. (15 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 56.1% | 55.0% | 57.1% | 2 |
| 2010s | 53.8% | 48.6% | 59.5% | 7 |
| 2020s | 47.5% | 46.7% | 49.1% | 3 |
Countries ranked near Brazil
More work & labour data for Brazil
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7328 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.7065 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.7581 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.74 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.1001 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 215,063 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 17,625 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 82,304 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 81,060 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 163,364 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Brazil?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban in Brazil was 49.1% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Brazil?
- The highest recorded value was 59.5% in 2011.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban recorded in Brazil?
- The lowest recorded value was 46.7% in 2020.
- How does Brazil rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Brazil ranks 12th out of 34 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban rising or falling in Brazil?
- Over the last ten years it is down 17.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Brazil data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group