Brazil vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Brazil
49.1%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
49.8%
in 2020
Brazil rank
12th
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Brazil
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 49.8% against 49.1% in Brazil, a difference of 0.7%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 34 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 55.0% | 42.6% | 12.4% | Brazil |
| 2010s | 53.8% | 48.9% | 4.9% | Brazil |
| 2020s | 46.7% | 49.8% | 3.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Brazil or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 49.8% against 49.1% in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.7%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Brazil ranks 12th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group