Kyrgyzstan vs Turkey: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Kyrgyzstan
49.8%
in 2020
Turkey
56.9%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Turkey rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Turkey
How they compare
Turkey currently reports 56.9% against 49.8% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 7.1%.
That makes Turkey's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Turkey ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Turkey ranks 9th of 34 countries.
Turkey has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Turkey | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.6% | 50.3% | 7.7% | Turkey |
| 2010s | 49.7% | 53.6% | 3.9% | Turkey |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Kyrgyzstan or Turkey?
- Turkey, at 56.9% against 49.8% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Kyrgyzstan and Turkey?
- 7.1%, with Turkey ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Turkey?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Turkey rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Turkey ranks 9th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group