Kyrgyzstan vs Ukraine: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Kyrgyzstan
49.8%
in 2020
Ukraine
54.8%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Ukraine rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Ukraine
How they compare
Ukraine currently reports 54.8% against 49.8% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 5.0%.
That makes Ukraine's figure about 1.1 times Kyrgyzstan's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ukraine ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 10th of 34 countries.
Ukraine has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Ukraine | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 42.6% | 50.8% | 8.2% | Ukraine |
| 2010s | 48.4% | 51.9% | 3.4% | Ukraine |
| 2020s | 49.8% | 54.8% | 5.0% | Ukraine |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Kyrgyzstan or Ukraine?
- Ukraine, at 54.8% against 49.8% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
- 5.0%, with Ukraine ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Ukraine rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Ukraine ranks 10th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group