Kyrgyzstan vs Uruguay: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban
Kyrgyzstan
49.8%
in 2020
Uruguay
48.3%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
11th
Uruguay rank
13th
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Uruguay
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 49.8% against 48.3% in Uruguay, a difference of 1.5%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 8 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Uruguay ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 34 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 48.9% | 52.4% | 3.5% | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 49.8% | 51.1% | 1.3% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban, Kyrgyzstan or Uruguay?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 49.8% against 48.3% in Uruguay as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban between Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 1.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Uruguay rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - all social insurance -urban?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 11th and Uruguay ranks 13th of 34 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -urban. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group