Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Kyrgyzstan
Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 47.6% in 2020. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Kyrgyzstan, 2006–2020
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Kyrgyzstan stood at 47.6%.
The figure is up 1.8% on the previous year and up 9.6% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Kyrgyzstan peaked at 54.2% in 2013 and was at its lowest, 30.0%, in 2006.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 31 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Kyrgyzstan, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 30.0% | — |
| 2011 | 43.5% | +45.0% |
| 2012 | 53.6% | +23.3% |
| 2013 | 54.2% | +1.1% |
| 2014 | 48.8% | -9.9% |
| 2015 | 47.2% | -3.2% |
| 2016 | 43.6% | -7.7% |
| 2017 | 47.6% | +9.2% |
| 2018 | 43.8% | -7.9% |
| 2019 | 46.8% | +6.7% |
| 2020 | 47.6% | +1.8% |
Kyrgyzstan compared with similar countries
- Kyrgyzstan's 47.6% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 58.3%, 82% of the median. (11 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 30.0% | 30.0% | 30.0% | 1 |
| 2010s | 47.7% | 43.5% | 54.2% | 9 |
| 2020s | 47.6% | 47.6% | 47.6% | 1 |
Countries ranked near Kyrgyzstan
More work & labour data for Kyrgyzstan
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual 0.0196 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth 0.0278 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth 0.0124 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -0.8283 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.79 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 4,346 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,767 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 5,899 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 5,831 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 11,730 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Kyrgyzstan?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Kyrgyzstan was 47.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The highest recorded value was 54.2% in 2013.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Kyrgyzstan?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.0% in 2006.
- How does Kyrgyzstan rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th out of 31 countries with data for 2020.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Kyrgyzstan?
- Over the last ten years it is up 9.6%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Kyrgyzstan data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group