Bolivia vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Bolivia
48.8%
in 2021
Kyrgyzstan
47.6%
in 2020
Bolivia rank
14th
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Bolivia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Bolivia currently reports 48.8% against 47.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 1.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 5 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Bolivia ahead.
Bolivia ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 31 countries.
Bolivia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bolivia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 50.1% | 47.8% | 2.4% | Bolivia |
| 2020s | 67.9% | 47.6% | 20.2% | Bolivia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Bolivia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Bolivia, at 48.8% against 47.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2021.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Bolivia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 1.2%, with Bolivia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bolivia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Bolivia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Bolivia ranks 14th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group