Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Chile
Chile: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural was 45.9% in 2022. ▬ Flat
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Chile, 2006–2022
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Chile recorded 45.9% for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in 2022. That is the highest value across all 8 years on record.
The figure is up 42.0% on the previous year and up 37.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Chile peaked at 45.9% in 2022 and was at its lowest, 30.1%, in 2015.
That places Chile 20th out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural in Chile, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2006 | 38.5% | — |
| 2009 | 38.9% | +1.2% |
| 2011 | 33.5% | -14.0% |
| 2013 | 35.7% | +6.7% |
| 2015 | 30.1% | -15.7% |
| 2017 | 31.1% | +3.3% |
| 2020 | 32.3% | +3.9% |
| 2022 | 45.9% | +42.0% |
Chile compared with similar countries
- Chile's 45.9% is below the median for high income countries, which is 50.7%, 90% of the median. (6 countries reporting)
- Chile's 45.9% is below the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 47.5%, 97% of the median. (12 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 38.7% | 38.5% | 38.9% | 2 |
| 2010s | 32.6% | 30.1% | 35.7% | 4 |
| 2020s | 39.1% | 32.3% | 45.9% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Chile
- 17 Kyrgyzstan 47.6% compare
- 18 Mongolia 47.5% compare
- 19 Dominican Republic 47.1% compare
- 21 Costa Rica 45.8% compare
- 22 Kazakhstan 45.2% compare
- 23 Pakistan 41.2% compare
More work & labour data for Chile
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.14 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.62 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.2334 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 19,028 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,690 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 6,735 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 6,695 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 13,431 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Chile?
- Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural in Chile was 45.9% in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Chile?
- The highest recorded value was 45.9% in 2022.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural recorded in Chile?
- The lowest recorded value was 30.1% in 2015.
- How does Chile rank for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Chile ranks 20th out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural rising or falling in Chile?
- Over the last ten years it is up 37.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is flat.
- Where does this Chile data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 8 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group