Kyrgyzstan vs Peru: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Kyrgyzstan
47.6%
in 2020
Peru
48.5%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Peru rank
15th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 48.5% against 47.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.9%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Peru ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Peru ranks 15th of 31 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Peru in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 47.7% | 48.0% | 0.3% | Peru |
| 2020s | 47.6% | 25.6% | 22.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Peru?
- Peru, at 48.5% against 47.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Peru?
- 0.9%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Peru?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Peru rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Peru ranks 15th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group