Ecuador vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Ecuador
47.9%
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
47.6%
in 2020
Ecuador rank
16th
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Ecuador
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 47.9% against 47.6% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.3%.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Ecuador ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 31 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 31.9% | 46.9% | 14.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 33.9% | 47.6% | 13.8% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Ecuador or Kyrgyzstan?
- Ecuador, at 47.9% against 47.6% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.3%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Ecuador and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Ecuador ranks 16th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group