Kyrgyzstan vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural
Kyrgyzstan
47.6%
in 2020
Mongolia
47.5%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
17th
Mongolia rank
18th
Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 47.6% against 47.5% in Mongolia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 31 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 46.7% | 38.4% | 8.3% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 47.6% | 47.5% | 0.1% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural, Kyrgyzstan or Mongolia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 47.6% against 47.5% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural between Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 0.1%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - all social insurance -rural?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 17th and Mongolia ranks 18th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 2nd quintile (%) - All Social Insurance -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group