Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile in Poland
Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile was 0.4617 poorest in 2019. ▼ Falling
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
Poland recorded 0.4617 poorest for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 4.4% on the previous year and down 21.1% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Poland peaked at 0.6312 poorest in 2015 and was at its lowest, 0.4617 poorest, in 2019.
That places Poland 11th out of 26 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile in Poland, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.5427 poorest | — |
| 2006 | 0.5504 poorest | +1.4% |
| 2007 | 0.5592 poorest | +1.6% |
| 2008 | 0.5654 poorest | +1.1% |
| 2009 | 0.5854 poorest | +3.5% |
| 2010 | 0.6141 poorest | +4.9% |
| 2011 | 0.6123 poorest | -0.3% |
| 2012 | 0.6145 poorest | +0.4% |
| 2015 | 0.6312 poorest | +2.7% |
| 2016 | 0.5701 poorest | -9.7% |
| 2017 | 0.4827 poorest | -15.3% |
| 2019 | 0.4617 poorest | -4.4% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.5606 poorest | 0.5427 poorest | 0.5854 poorest | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.5695 poorest | 0.4617 poorest | 0.6312 poorest | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Poland?
- Benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Poland was 0.4617 poorest in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.6312 poorest in 2015.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.4617 poorest in 2019.
- How does Poland rank for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
- Poland ranks 11th out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 21.1%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)