Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile in Armenia
Armenia: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile was 0.4297 poorest in 2022. ▼ Falling
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile in Armenia, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
The most recent figure for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Armenia is 0.4297 poorest, measured in 2022.
That represents a change of down 14.2% on the previous year and down 2.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Armenia peaked at 0.5078 poorest in 2017 and was at its lowest, 0.3537 poorest, in 2020.
That places Armenia 13th out of 26 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 15 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile in Armenia, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.4893 poorest | — |
| 2009 | 0.4757 poorest | -2.8% |
| 2010 | 0.4743 poorest | -0.3% |
| 2011 | 0.4559 poorest | -3.9% |
| 2012 | 0.4402 poorest | -3.4% |
| 2013 | 0.4298 poorest | -2.4% |
| 2014 | 0.4457 poorest | +3.7% |
| 2015 | 0.432 poorest | -3.1% |
| 2016 | 0.4216 poorest | -2.4% |
| 2017 | 0.5078 poorest | +20.4% |
| 2018 | 0.4879 poorest | -3.9% |
| 2019 | 0.4217 poorest | -13.6% |
| 2020 | 0.3537 poorest | -16.1% |
| 2021 | 0.5006 poorest | +41.5% |
| 2022 | 0.4297 poorest | -14.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4825 poorest | 0.4757 poorest | 0.4893 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.4517 poorest | 0.4216 poorest | 0.5078 poorest | 10 |
| 2020s | 0.428 poorest | 0.3537 poorest | 0.5006 poorest | 3 |
Countries ranked near Armenia
More work & labour data for Armenia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.7088 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.6966 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.721 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0634 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,005 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 695.21 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 854.22 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 837.98 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 1,692 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Armenia?
- Benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Armenia was 0.4297 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile recorded in Armenia?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5078 poorest in 2017.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile recorded in Armenia?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3537 poorest in 2020.
- How does Armenia rank for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
- Armenia ranks 13th out of 26 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Armenia?
- Over the last ten years it is down 2.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Armenia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 15 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)