Armenia vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile
Armenia
0.4297 poorest
in 2022
Poland
0.4617 poorest
in 2019
Armenia rank
13th
Poland rank
11th
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Armenia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 0.4617 poorest against 0.4297 poorest in Armenia, a difference of 0.032 poorest.
That makes Poland's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Poland ahead.
Armenia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 11th of 26 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4825 poorest | 0.5754 poorest | 0.0929 poorest | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.4505 poorest | 0.5695 poorest | 0.119 poorest | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile, Armenia or Poland?
- Poland, at 0.4617 poorest against 0.4297 poorest in Armenia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile between Armenia and Poland?
- 0.032 poorest, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Poland?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
- Armenia ranks 13th and Poland ranks 11th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)