Armenia vs Kyrgyzstan: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile
Armenia
0.4297 poorest
in 2022
Kyrgyzstan
0.4721 poorest
in 2020
Armenia rank
13th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Armenia
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.4721 poorest against 0.4297 poorest in Armenia, a difference of 0.0424 poorest.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.1 times Armenia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Kyrgyzstan ahead.
Armenia ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 26 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Kyrgyzstan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.4492 poorest | 0.4404 poorest | 0.0087 poorest | Armenia |
| 2020s | 0.3537 poorest | 0.4721 poorest | 0.1184 poorest | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile, Armenia or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.4721 poorest against 0.4297 poorest in Armenia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile between Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 0.0424 poorest, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Kyrgyzstan?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
- Armenia ranks 13th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)