Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile in Belarus
Belarus: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile was 0.5132 poorest in 2019. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 0.5132 poorest for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in 2019. That is the highest value across all 11 years on record.
The figure is up 8.5% on the previous year and up 29.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Belarus peaked at 0.5132 poorest in 2019 and was at its lowest, 0.3955 poorest, in 2009.
Belarus ranks 9th of 26 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile in Belarus, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.426 poorest | — |
| 2009 | 0.3955 poorest | -7.2% |
| 2010 | 0.413 poorest | +4.4% |
| 2012 | 0.4229 poorest | +2.4% |
| 2013 | 0.4132 poorest | -2.3% |
| 2014 | 0.4141 poorest | +0.2% |
| 2015 | 0.4106 poorest | -0.9% |
| 2016 | 0.4492 poorest | +9.4% |
| 2017 | 0.4599 poorest | +2.4% |
| 2018 | 0.473 poorest | +2.9% |
| 2019 | 0.5132 poorest | +8.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4108 poorest | 0.3955 poorest | 0.426 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.441 poorest | 0.4106 poorest | 0.5132 poorest | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Belarus?
- Benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile in Belarus was 0.5132 poorest in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.5132 poorest in 2019.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.3955 poorest in 2009.
- How does Belarus rank for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
- Belarus ranks 9th out of 26 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 29.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)