Kyrgyzstan vs Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile
Kyrgyzstan
0.4721 poorest
in 2020
Poland
0.4617 poorest
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Poland rank
11th
Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Poland
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0.4721 poorest against 0.4617 poorest in Poland, a difference of 0.0104 poorest.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Poland ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th and Poland ranks 11th of 26 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.4954 poorest | 0.5504 poorest | 0.055 poorest | Poland |
| 2010s | 0.424 poorest | 0.5621 poorest | 0.1381 poorest | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile, Kyrgyzstan or Poland?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 0.4721 poorest against 0.4617 poorest in Poland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile between Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 0.0104 poorest, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Poland?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2019.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Poland rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - unconditional cash transfers -1st quintile?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th and Poland ranks 11th of 26 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Unconditional Cash Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Cash Transfers programs (%)