Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) by country

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)

Countries reporting
31
Highest
0.3445 poorest
Thailand
Lowest
0.006 poorest
Poland
Median
0.218 poorest
Years covered
21
2003–2023
Data points
318

What the numbers show

Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest) is currently reported for 31 countries. The highest value is 0.3445 poorest in Thailand; the lowest is 0.006 poorest in Poland.

The median across all reporting countries is 0.218 poorest, and the mean is 0.2092 poorest.

The gap between the highest and lowest reporting country is a factor of about 58.

Over the past decade 19 countries rose and 12 fell. The largest increase was in Republic of Moldova (up 148.4%), and the largest decrease in Poland (down 97.0%).

Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile: full country ranking

#Country LatestYear 10-year changeTrend
1 Thailand 0.3445 poorest 2021 up 12.2% rising
2 Romania 0.3172 poorest 2021 up 53.0% rising
3 Pakistan 0.3055 poorest 2018 down 8.3% flat
4 Dominican Republic 0.3033 poorest 2021 up 25.6% rising
5 Republic of Moldova 0.2707 poorest 2018 up 148.4% rising
6 Sri Lanka 0.2457 poorest 2019 up 15.3% falling
7 Mongolia 0.2432 poorest 2020 up 34.9% rising
8 Belarus 0.2394 poorest 2019 up 8.3% rising
9 Viet Nam 0.2379 poorest 2020 up 96.3% rising
10 Georgia 0.2363 poorest 2021 up 78.9% rising
11 Costa Rica 0.2342 poorest 2022 up 38.0% rising
12 Paraguay 0.2313 poorest 2022 up 35.6% rising
13 Mexico 0.2298 poorest 2022 down 2.9% falling
14 Uruguay 0.2249 poorest 2022 up 30.6% rising
15 Chile 0.2184 poorest 2022 down 8.8% falling
16 Argentina 0.218 poorest 2022 down 16.4% falling
17 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 0.2171 poorest 2021 up 11.2% rising
18 Colombia 0.2116 poorest 2022 up 12.6% rising
19 Kyrgyzstan 0.2105 poorest 2020 down 14.0% rising
20 El Salvador 0.2091 poorest 2022 up 14.1% flat
21 Armenia 0.2011 poorest 2022 down 21.3% falling
22 Ecuador 0.1845 poorest 2022 down 14.0% falling
23 Peru 0.1707 poorest 2022 up 89.0% rising
24 Kazakhstan 0.1662 poorest 2021 up 24.4% rising
25 Honduras 0.1574 poorest 2019 up 9.7% falling
26 Türkiye 0.1557 poorest 2019 down 32.8% falling
27 Panama 0.1507 poorest 2023 down 7.1% flat
28 Brazil 0.1381 poorest 2022 down 47.7% falling
29 Malawi 0.1342 poorest 2019 up 45.0% rising
30 Burkina Faso 0.0711 poorest 2021 down 47.8% falling
31 Poland 0.006 poorest 2019 down 97.0% falling

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile by country. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-domestic-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/benefit-cost-ratio-domestic-private-transfers-1st-quintile-poorest/">Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile by country</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest)
Unit
poorest
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
31 places, 318 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)