Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile in Poland
Poland: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.006 poorest in 2019. ▼ Falling
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile in Poland, 2005–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
Poland recorded 0.006 poorest for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in 2019. That is the lowest value across all 12 years on record.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 96.6% on the previous year and down 97.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Poland peaked at 0.2055 poorest in 2012 and was at its lowest, 0.006 poorest, in 2019.
That places Poland 31st out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the bottom quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 12 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile in Poland, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2005 | 0.1991 poorest | — |
| 2006 | 0.2043 poorest | +2.6% |
| 2007 | 0.1852 poorest | -9.3% |
| 2008 | 0.1824 poorest | -1.5% |
| 2009 | 0.2009 poorest | +10.1% |
| 2010 | 0.1853 poorest | -7.7% |
| 2011 | 0.1987 poorest | +7.2% |
| 2012 | 0.2055 poorest | +3.4% |
| 2015 | 0.1842 poorest | -10.4% |
| 2016 | 0.176 poorest | -4.5% |
| 2017 | 0.1738 poorest | -1.3% |
| 2019 | 0.006 poorest | -96.6% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1944 poorest | 0.1824 poorest | 0.2043 poorest | 5 |
| 2010s | 0.1614 poorest | 0.006 poorest | 0.2055 poorest | 7 |
Countries ranked near Poland
More work & labour data for Poland
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.03 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.04 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.28 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0452 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 22,799 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 9,591 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,786 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,544 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,330 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Poland?
- Benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Poland was 0.006 poorest in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Poland?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2055 poorest in 2012.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Poland?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.006 poorest in 2019.
- How does Poland rank for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile?
- Poland ranks 31st out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Poland?
- Over the last ten years it is down 97.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Poland data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 12 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)