Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile in Belarus
Belarus: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.2394 poorest in 2019. ▲ Rising
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
In 2019, benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Belarus stood at 0.2394 poorest.
That represents a change of up 6.5% on the previous year and up 8.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Belarus peaked at 0.2444 poorest in 2013 and was at its lowest, 0.1801 poorest, in 2008.
That places Belarus 8th out of 31 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile in Belarus, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.1801 poorest | — |
| 2009 | 0.2211 poorest | +22.7% |
| 2010 | 0.1877 poorest | -15.1% |
| 2012 | 0.2428 poorest | +29.3% |
| 2013 | 0.2444 poorest | +0.7% |
| 2014 | 0.2272 poorest | -7.0% |
| 2015 | 0.188 poorest | -17.3% |
| 2016 | 0.2261 poorest | +20.3% |
| 2017 | 0.1946 poorest | -13.9% |
| 2018 | 0.2248 poorest | +15.5% |
| 2019 | 0.2394 poorest | +6.5% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.2006 poorest | 0.1801 poorest | 0.2211 poorest | 2 |
| 2010s | 0.2194 poorest | 0.1877 poorest | 0.2444 poorest | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Belarus?
- Benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Belarus was 0.2394 poorest in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2444 poorest in 2013.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1801 poorest in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile?
- Belarus ranks 8th out of 31 countries with data for 2019.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 8.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)