Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador
Ecuador: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile was 0.1845 poorest in 2022. ▼ Falling
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador, 2008–2022
Source: ASPIRE. Measured in poorest.
Analysis
Ecuador recorded 0.1845 poorest for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in 2022.
That represents a change of up 18.2% on the previous year and down 14.0% over ten years.
Over the whole period, benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador peaked at 0.2209 poorest in 2016 and was at its lowest, 0.1364 poorest, in 2020.
That places Ecuador 22nd out of 31 countries with data for 2022, putting it in the middle of the range.
The long-run direction has been consistently falling across the 13 years of available data.
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador, year by year
| Year | poorest | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 0.1557 poorest | — |
| 2010 | 0.2078 poorest | +33.4% |
| 2011 | 0.1873 poorest | -9.9% |
| 2012 | 0.2145 poorest | +14.5% |
| 2014 | 0.1512 poorest | -29.5% |
| 2015 | 0.1653 poorest | +9.3% |
| 2016 | 0.2209 poorest | +33.6% |
| 2017 | 0.1751 poorest | -20.7% |
| 2018 | 0.16 poorest | -8.7% |
| 2019 | 0.1665 poorest | +4.1% |
| 2020 | 0.1364 poorest | -18.1% |
| 2021 | 0.1562 poorest | +14.5% |
| 2022 | 0.1845 poorest | +18.2% |
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1557 poorest | 0.1557 poorest | 0.1557 poorest | 1 |
| 2010s | 0.1832 poorest | 0.1512 poorest | 0.2209 poorest | 9 |
| 2020s | 0.159 poorest | 0.1364 poorest | 0.1845 poorest | 3 |
Countries ranked near Ecuador
- 19 Kyrgyzstan 0.2105 poorest compare
- 20 El Salvador 0.2091 poorest compare
- 21 Armenia 0.2011 poorest compare
- 23 Peru 0.1707 poorest compare
- 24 Kazakhstan 0.1662 poorest compare
- 25 Honduras 0.1574 poorest compare
More work & labour data for Ecuador
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.578 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.567 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.589 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.04 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.13 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 17,174 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 5,794 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 9,543 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 9,549 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 19,092 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador?
- Benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile in Ecuador was 0.1845 poorest in 2022, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Ecuador?
- The highest recorded value was 0.2209 poorest in 2016.
- What is the lowest benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile recorded in Ecuador?
- The lowest recorded value was 0.1364 poorest in 2020.
- How does Ecuador rank for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile?
- Ecuador ranks 22nd out of 31 countries with data for 2022.
- Is benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile rising or falling in Ecuador?
- Over the last ten years it is down 14.0%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
- Where does this Ecuador data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 13 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)