Ecuador vs El Salvador: Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile
Ecuador
0.1845 poorest
in 2022
El Salvador
0.2091 poorest
in 2022
Ecuador rank
22nd
El Salvador rank
20th
Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile over time
- Ecuador
- El Salvador
How they compare
El Salvador currently reports 0.2091 poorest against 0.1845 poorest in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0246 poorest.
That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2008 it was El Salvador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 22nd and El Salvador ranks 20th of 31 countries.
El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | El Salvador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0.1557 poorest | 0.2506 poorest | 0.0948 poorest | El Salvador |
| 2010s | 0.1832 poorest | 0.2059 poorest | 0.0227 poorest | El Salvador |
| 2020s | 0.1703 poorest | 0.1918 poorest | 0.0215 poorest | El Salvador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile, Ecuador or El Salvador?
- El Salvador, at 0.2091 poorest against 0.1845 poorest in Ecuador as of 2022.
- What is the difference in benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile between Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 0.0246 poorest, with El Salvador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and El Salvador?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2022.
- How do Ecuador and El Salvador rank globally for benefit-cost ratio - domestic private transfers -1st quintile?
- Ecuador ranks 22nd and El Salvador ranks 20th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Benefit-cost ratio - Domestic Private Transfers -1st quintile (poorest). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Poverty gap reduction obtained for each $1 spent in Domestic Private Transfers programs (%)