Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Belarus
Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 38.0% in 2019. ◆ Volatile
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Belarus, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Belarus recorded 38.0% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in 2019.
Compared with earlier readings it is down 17.6% on the previous year and up 34.8% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Belarus peaked at 163.4% in 2016 and was at its lowest, 24.0%, in 2008.
Belarus ranks 7th of 24 countries on this measure, in the middle of the range.
The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Belarus, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 24.0% | — |
| 2009 | 28.2% | +17.3% |
| 2010 | 29.7% | +5.4% |
| 2012 | 27.4% | -7.8% |
| 2013 | 36.0% | +31.6% |
| 2014 | 50.1% | +39.1% |
| 2015 | 42.3% | -15.5% |
| 2016 | 163.4% | +285.8% |
| 2017 | 43.5% | -73.3% |
| 2018 | 46.1% | +5.9% |
| 2019 | 38.0% | -17.6% |
Belarus compared with similar countries
- Belarus's 38.0% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 36.2%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Belarus's 38.0% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 19.5%, 2.0× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 26.1% | 24.0% | 28.2% | 2 |
| 2010s | 52.9% | 27.4% | 163.4% | 9 |
Countries ranked near Belarus
- 4 Kosovo 40.8% compare
- 4 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 40.8% compare
- 6 Armenia 40.6% compare
- 8 Romania 34.4% compare
- 9 Costa Rica 27.4% compare
- 10 Kyrgyzstan 26.4% compare
More work & labour data for Belarus
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -1.15 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -1.12 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -1.18 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.98 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate -0.0716 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 7,566 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 1,004 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 2,235 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 2,116 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 4,351 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Belarus?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Belarus was 38.0% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Belarus?
- The highest recorded value was 163.4% in 2016.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Belarus?
- The lowest recorded value was 24.0% in 2008.
- How does Belarus rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 7th out of 24 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Belarus?
- Over the last ten years it is up 34.8%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
- Where does this Belarus data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group