Belarus vs Costa Rica: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
38.0%
in 2019
Costa Rica
27.4%
in 2022
Belarus rank
7th
Costa Rica rank
9th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 38.0% against 27.4% in Costa Rica, a difference of 10.6%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.4 times Costa Rica's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 7th and Costa Rica ranks 9th of 24 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 24.0% | 23.3% | 0.7% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 55.1% | 26.1% | 28.9% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or Costa Rica?
- Belarus, at 38.0% against 27.4% in Costa Rica as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 10.6%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Costa Rica?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Costa Rica rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Costa Rica ranks 9th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group