Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo

Kosovo: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 40.8% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
40.8%
World rank
4th
of 24 countries
All-time high
44.8%
in 2006
All-time low
30.9%
in 2012
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo, 2006–2017

0102030402006201120172006: 44.82011: 36.62012: 30.92013: 35.32017: 40.8

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo is 40.8%, measured in 2017.

That represents a change of down 8.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo peaked at 44.8% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 30.9%, in 2012.

That places Kosovo 4th out of 24 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural in Kosovo, 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 44.8%
2011 36.6% -18.3%
2012 30.9% -15.7%
2013 35.3% +14.2%
2017 40.8% +15.9%

Kosovo compared with similar countries

  • Kosovo's 40.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 36.2%, 1.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
  • Kosovo's 40.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 19.5%, 2.1× the median. (16 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 44.8% 44.8% 44.8% 1
2010s 35.9% 30.9% 40.8% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 1 Georgia 77.8% compare
  2. 2 Serbia 51.6% compare
  3. 3 Poland 50.1% compare
  4. 4 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 40.8% compare
  5. 6 Armenia 40.6% compare
  6. 7 Belarus 38.0% compare

See the full ranking of 24 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Kosovo was 40.8% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 44.8% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 30.9% in 2012.
How does Kosovo rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
Kosovo ranks 4th out of 24 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Kosovo?
Over the last ten years it is down 8.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/kosovo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-unconditional-cash-transfers-rural/kosovo/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Kosovo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
24 places, 202 data points, 2004–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group