Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Georgia
Georgia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional was 77.8% in 2021. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Georgia, 2011–2021
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
Georgia recorded 77.8% for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in 2021.
That represents a change of down 0.6% on the previous year and up 51.3% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Georgia peaked at 92.6% in 2014 and was at its lowest, 51.4%, in 2011.
Georgia ranks 1st of 24 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 11 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional in Georgia, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2011 | 51.4% | — |
| 2012 | 55.5% | +8.0% |
| 2013 | 64.3% | +15.9% |
| 2014 | 92.6% | +43.9% |
| 2015 | 81.1% | -12.4% |
| 2016 | 72.9% | -10.2% |
| 2017 | 78.8% | +8.1% |
| 2018 | 68.9% | -12.6% |
| 2019 | 72.5% | +5.2% |
| 2020 | 78.2% | +7.9% |
| 2021 | 77.8% | -0.6% |
Georgia compared with similar countries
- Georgia's 77.8% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 36.2%, 2.1× the median. (12 countries reporting)
- Georgia's 77.8% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 19.5%, 4.0× the median. (16 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 70.9% | 51.4% | 92.6% | 9 |
| 2020s | 78.0% | 77.8% | 78.2% | 2 |
Countries ranked near Georgia
More work & labour data for Georgia
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.5749 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.5695 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.5795 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -2.16 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 0.0234 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 2,483 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 911.09 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 1,505 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 1,465 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 2,969 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Georgia?
- Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional in Georgia was 77.8% in 2021, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Georgia?
- The highest recorded value was 92.6% in 2014.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional recorded in Georgia?
- The lowest recorded value was 51.4% in 2011.
- How does Georgia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Georgia ranks 1st out of 24 countries with data for 2021.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional rising or falling in Georgia?
- Over the last ten years it is up 51.3%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Georgia data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 11 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group