Belarus vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Belarus
38.0%
in 2019
Kyrgyzstan
26.4%
in 2020
Belarus rank
7th
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Belarus
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Belarus currently reports 38.0% against 26.4% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 11.6%.
That makes Belarus's figure about 1.4 times Kyrgyzstan's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Belarus has been ahead every year.
Belarus ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Belarus or Kyrgyzstan?
- Belarus, at 38.0% against 26.4% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 11.6%, with Belarus ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Kyrgyzstan?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2019.
- How do Belarus and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Belarus ranks 7th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group