Armenia vs Belarus: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional
Armenia
40.6%
in 2022
Belarus
38.0%
in 2019
Armenia rank
6th
Belarus rank
7th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional over time
- Armenia
- Belarus
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 40.6% against 38.0% in Belarus, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.1 times Belarus's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Armenia ahead.
Armenia ranks 6th and Belarus ranks 7th of 24 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Belarus in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Belarus | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 31.9% | 26.1% | 5.8% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 34.3% | 52.9% | 18.7% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional, Armenia or Belarus?
- Armenia, at 40.6% against 38.0% in Belarus as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional between Armenia and Belarus?
- 2.6%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Belarus?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2019.
- How do Armenia and Belarus rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - unconditional?
- Armenia ranks 6th and Belarus ranks 7th of 24 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - Unconditional Cash Transfers -rural. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group