Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Mongolia

Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International was 80.6% in 2020. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2020)
80.6%
Change on year
up 511.7%
World rank
4th
of 27 countries
All-time high
80.6%
in 2020
All-time low
13.2%
in 2018
Years of data
9
2007–2020

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Mongolia, 2007–2020

204060802007201320202007: 33.52009: 232010: 28.42011: 36.72012: 28.12014: 64.12016: 22.12018: 13.22020: 80.6

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

In 2020, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Mongolia stood at 80.6%. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 511.7% on the previous year and up 183.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Mongolia peaked at 80.6% in 2020 and was at its lowest, 13.2%, in 2018.

That places Mongolia 4th out of 27 countries with data for 2020, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Mongolia, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers in Mongolia, 2007 to 2020.
Year Value Change
2007 33.5%
2009 23.0% -31.2%
2010 28.4% +23.5%
2011 36.7% +29.0%
2012 28.1% -23.4%
2014 64.1% +128.1%
2016 22.1% -65.6%
2018 13.2% -40.2%
2020 80.6% +511.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 28.3% 23.0% 33.5% 2
2010s 32.1% 13.2% 64.1% 6
2020s 80.6% 80.6% 80.6% 1

Countries ranked near Mongolia

  1. 1 Poland 42,799.2% compare
  2. 2 Armenia 109.3% compare
  3. 3 Kyrgyzstan 94.1% compare
  4. 5 Serbia 76.2% compare
  5. 6 Republic of Moldova 62.6% compare
  6. 7 Georgia 62.0% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Mongolia

All data for Mongolia →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Mongolia?
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international in Mongolia was 80.6% in 2020, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Mongolia?
The highest recorded value was 80.6% in 2020.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international recorded in Mongolia?
The lowest recorded value was 13.2% in 2018.
How does Mongolia rank for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
Mongolia ranks 4th out of 27 countries with data for 2020.
Is adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international rising or falling in Mongolia?
Over the last ten years it is up 183.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Mongolia data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Mongolia. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-international-private-transfers/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-1st-quintile-poorest-percent-international-private-transfers/mongolia/">Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International in Mongolia</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group