Armenia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Armenia
109.3%
in 2022
Mongolia
80.6%
in 2020
Armenia rank
2nd
Mongolia rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Armenia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Armenia currently reports 109.3% against 80.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 28.7%.
That makes Armenia's figure about 1.4 times Mongolia's.
Across all 8 years both countries report, Armenia has been ahead every year.
Armenia ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Armenia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Armenia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 79.5% | 23.0% | 56.5% | Armenia |
| 2010s | 108.6% | 32.1% | 76.5% | Armenia |
| 2020s | 121.2% | 80.6% | 40.5% | Armenia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Armenia or Mongolia?
- Armenia, at 109.3% against 80.6% in Mongolia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Armenia and Mongolia?
- 28.7%, with Armenia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Mongolia?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
- How do Armenia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Armenia ranks 2nd and Mongolia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group