Mongolia vs Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Mongolia
80.6%
in 2020
Poland
42,799.2%
in 2019
Mongolia rank
4th
Poland rank
1st
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Mongolia
- Poland
How they compare
Poland currently reports 42,799.2% against 80.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 42,718.6%.
That makes Poland's figure about 530.8 times Mongolia's.
Across all 5 years both countries report, Poland has been ahead every year.
Mongolia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
Poland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mongolia | Poland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 23.0% | 66.8% | 43.7% | Poland |
| 2010s | 28.8% | 60.8% | 32.0% | Poland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Mongolia or Poland?
- Poland, at 42,799.2% against 80.6% in Mongolia as of 2019.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Mongolia and Poland?
- 42,718.6%, with Poland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Poland?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2016.
- How do Mongolia and Poland rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Mongolia ranks 4th and Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group