Georgia vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Georgia
62.0%
in 2021
Mongolia
80.6%
in 2020
Georgia rank
7th
Mongolia rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Georgia
- Mongolia
How they compare
Mongolia currently reports 80.6% against 62.0% in Georgia, a difference of 18.6%.
That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.3 times Georgia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 6 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Georgia ahead.
Georgia ranks 7th and Mongolia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 1 and Mongolia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 106.2% | 32.8% | 73.3% | Georgia |
| 2020s | 53.0% | 80.6% | 27.6% | Mongolia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Georgia or Mongolia?
- Mongolia, at 80.6% against 62.0% in Georgia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Georgia and Mongolia?
- 18.6%, with Mongolia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Georgia and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Georgia ranks 7th and Mongolia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group