Kyrgyzstan vs Mongolia: Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International
Kyrgyzstan
94.1%
in 2020
Mongolia
80.6%
in 2020
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Mongolia rank
4th
Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Mongolia
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 94.1% against 80.6% in Mongolia, a difference of 13.5%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.2 times Mongolia's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Mongolia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
Kyrgyzstan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 93.8% | 32.8% | 60.9% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 94.1% | 80.6% | 13.5% | Kyrgyzstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international, Kyrgyzstan or Mongolia?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 94.1% against 80.6% in Mongolia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international between Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 13.5%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Mongolia rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - international?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd and Mongolia ranks 4th of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 1st quintile (poorest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group