Statizoid

Criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment in Lithuania

Lithuania: Criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment was 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2023. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2023)
1 (1=yes; 0=no)
Change on year
unchanged
World rank
1st
of 188 countries
All-time high
1 (1=yes; 0=no)
in 2001
All-time low
0 (1=yes; 0=no)
in 1970
Years of data
54
1970–2023

Criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment in Lithuania, 1970–2023

00.20.40.60.81197019962023

Source: Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data. Measured in (1=yes; 0=no).

Analysis

Lithuania recorded 1 (1=yes; 0=no) for criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment in 2023. That is the highest value across all 54 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is unchanged over ten years.

Over the whole period, criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment in Lithuania peaked at 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2001 and was at its lowest, 0 (1=yes; 0=no), in 1970.

Lithuania ranks 1st of 188 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

The series is highly variable year to year, so single readings are best treated with caution.

Criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment in Lithuania, year by year

Year (1=yes; 0=no) Change
1970 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1971 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1972 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1973 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1974 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1975 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1976 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1977 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1978 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1979 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1980 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1981 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1982 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1983 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1984 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1985 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1986 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1987 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1988 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1989 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1990 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1991 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1992 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1993 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1994 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1995 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1996 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1997 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1998 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
1999 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2000 0 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2001 1 (1=yes; 0=no) —
2002 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2003 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2004 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2005 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2006 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2007 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2008 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2009 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2010 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2011 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2012 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2013 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2014 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2015 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2016 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2017 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2018 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2019 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2020 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2021 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2022 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%
2023 1 (1=yes; 0=no) +0.0%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
1970s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
1980s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
1990s 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
2000s 0.9 (1=yes; 0=no) 0 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
2010s 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 10
2020s 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 1 (1=yes; 0=no) 4

Countries ranked near Lithuania

  1. 1 Afghanistan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  2. 1 Albania 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  3. 1 Algeria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  4. 1 Angola 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  5. 1 Australia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  6. 1 Austria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  7. 1 Azerbaijan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  8. 1 Bahamas 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  9. 1 Bahrain 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  10. 1 Barbados 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  11. 1 Belgium 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  12. 1 Belize 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  13. 1 Benin 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  14. 1 Bhutan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  15. 1 Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  16. 1 Bosnia and Herzegovina 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  17. 1 Brazil 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  18. 1 Bulgaria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  19. 1 Burkina Faso 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  20. 1 Burundi 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  21. 1 Cambodia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  22. 1 Cameroon 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  23. 1 Canada 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  24. 1 Cape Verde 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  25. 1 Central African Republic 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  26. 1 Chad 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  27. 1 China 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  28. 1 Colombia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  29. 1 Comoros 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  30. 1 Congo 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  31. 1 Costa Rica 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  32. 1 Côte d'Ivoire 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  33. 1 Croatia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  34. 1 Cyprus 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  35. 1 Czechia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  36. 1 Congo, Democratic Republic of the 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  37. 1 Denmark 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  38. 1 Djibouti 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  39. 1 Dominican Republic 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  40. 1 Ecuador 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  41. 1 Egypt 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  42. 1 El Salvador 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  43. 1 Equatorial Guinea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  44. 1 Eritrea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  45. 1 Estonia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  46. 1 Ethiopia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  47. 1 Fiji 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  48. 1 Finland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  49. 1 France 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  50. 1 Gabon 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  51. 1 Georgia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  52. 1 Germany 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  53. 1 Ghana 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  54. 1 Greece 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  55. 1 Guinea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  56. 1 Guyana 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  57. 1 Honduras 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  58. 1 Hong Kong, China 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  59. 1 Iceland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  60. 1 India 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  61. 1 Indonesia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  62. 1 Iraq 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  63. 1 Ireland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  64. 1 Israel 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  65. 1 Italy 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  66. 1 Jamaica 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  67. 1 Jordan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  68. 1 Kenya 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  69. 1 Kiribati 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  70. 1 Kuwait 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  71. 1 Kyrgyzstan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  72. 1 Latvia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  73. 1 Lebanon 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  74. 1 Liberia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  75. 1 Luxembourg 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  76. 1 Madagascar 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  77. 1 Malawi 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  78. 1 Maldives 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  79. 1 Malta 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  80. 1 Mauritius 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  81. 1 Mexico 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  82. 1 Republic of Moldova 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  83. 1 Mongolia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  84. 1 Montenegro 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  85. 1 Morocco 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  86. 1 Mozambique 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  87. 1 Nepal 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  88. 1 Netherlands 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  89. 1 New Zealand 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  90. 1 Nicaragua 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  91. 1 Niger 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  92. 1 Nigeria 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  93. 1 North Macedonia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  94. 1 Norway 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  95. 1 Pakistan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  96. 1 Panama 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  97. 1 Paraguay 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  98. 1 Peru 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  99. 1 Philippines 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  100. 1 Poland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  101. 1 Portugal 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  102. 1 Puerto Rico 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  103. 1 Romania 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  104. 1 Rwanda 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  105. 1 Saint Lucia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  106. 1 Samoa 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  107. 1 Sao Tome and Principe 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  108. 1 Saudi Arabia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  109. 1 Senegal 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  110. 1 Serbia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  111. 1 Sierra Leone 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  112. 1 Singapore 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  113. 1 Slovakia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  114. 1 Slovenia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  115. 1 South Africa 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  116. 1 Republic of Korea 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  117. 1 South Sudan 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  118. 1 Spain 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  119. 1 Sri Lanka 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  120. 1 Suriname 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  121. 1 Sweden 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  122. 1 Switzerland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  123. 1 Tanzania, United Republic of 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  124. 1 Thailand 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  125. 1 Togo 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  126. 1 Tunisia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  127. 1 Türkiye 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  128. 1 Uganda 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  129. 1 Ukraine 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  130. 1 United Arab Emirates 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  131. 1 United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  132. 1 United States of America 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  133. 1 Uruguay 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  134. 1 Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  135. 1 Viet Nam 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  136. 1 Zambia 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare
  137. 1 Zimbabwe 1 (1=yes; 0=no) compare

See the full ranking of 188 places →

More work & labour data for Lithuania

All data for Lithuania →

Frequently asked questions

What is criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment in Lithuania?
Criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment in Lithuania was 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2023, according to Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data.
What is the highest criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment recorded in Lithuania?
The highest recorded value was 1 (1=yes; 0=no) in 2001.
What is the lowest criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment recorded in Lithuania?
The lowest recorded value was 0 (1=yes; 0=no) in 1970.
How does Lithuania rank for criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment?
Lithuania ranks 1st out of 188 countries with data for 2023.
Is criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment rising or falling in Lithuania?
Over the last ten years it is unchanged. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Lithuania data come from?
The figures come from Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data, published as part of Criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 54 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment in Lithuania. Statizoid, drawing on Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/criminal-penalties-or-civil-remedies-sexual-harassment-in-employment/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/criminal-penalties-or-civil-remedies-sexual-harassment-in-employment/lithuania/">Criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment in Lithuania</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Criminal sanctions or compensation for workplace sexual harassment
Unit
(1=yes; 0=no)
Source
Women, Business and the Law; World Bank – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
188 places, 10,152 data points, 1970–2023
Last refreshed

The law punishes sexual harassment at work with fines or prison, requires offenders to compensate victims, or allows victims to seek civil remedies even after losing their job.