Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Pakistan

Pakistan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International was 61.1% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
61.1%
Change on year
down 0.3%
World rank
4th
of 27 countries
All-time high
84.0%
in 2007
All-time low
61.1%
in 2018
Years of data
5
2007–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Pakistan, 2007–2018

0204060802007201220182007: 842009: 66.72013: 65.92015: 61.32018: 61.1

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Pakistan is 61.1%, measured in 2018. That is the lowest value across all 5 years on record.

Compared with earlier readings it is down 0.3% on the previous year and down 27.2% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Pakistan peaked at 84.0% in 2007 and was at its lowest, 61.1%, in 2018.

Pakistan ranks 4th of 27 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Pakistan, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers in Pakistan, 2007 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2007 84.0%
2009 66.7% -20.6%
2013 65.9% -1.2%
2015 61.3% -6.9%
2018 61.1% -0.3%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 75.3% 66.7% 84.0% 2
2010s 62.8% 61.1% 65.9% 3

Countries ranked near Pakistan

  1. 1 Poland 16,763.7% compare
  2. 2 Armenia 67.0% compare
  3. 3 Kyrgyzstan 62.3% compare
  4. 5 Republic of Moldova 51.2% compare
  5. 6 Kosovo 49.7% compare
  6. 6 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 49.7% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Pakistan

All data for Pakistan →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Pakistan?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Pakistan was 61.1% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Pakistan?
The highest recorded value was 84.0% in 2007.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Pakistan?
The lowest recorded value was 61.1% in 2018.
How does Pakistan rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
Pakistan ranks 4th out of 27 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international rising or falling in Pakistan?
Over the last ten years it is down 27.2%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Pakistan data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Pakistan. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/pakistan/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Pakistan</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group