Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Poland

Poland: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International was 16,763.7% in 2019. ◆ Volatile

Latest (2019)
16,763.7%
Change on year
up 93,317.8%
World rank
1st
of 27 countries
All-time high
16,763.7%
in 2019
All-time low
17.9%
in 2017
Years of data
9
2008–2019

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Poland, 2008–2019

05.0k10.0k15.0k2008201320192008: 27.72009: 47.92010: 38.52011: 422012: 38.42015: 28.42016: 20.32017: 17.92019: 16.8k

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Poland recorded 16,763.7% for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in 2019. That is the highest value across all 9 years on record.

The figure is up 93,317.8% on the previous year and up 34,924.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Poland peaked at 16,763.7% in 2019 and was at its lowest, 17.9%, in 2017.

Poland ranks 1st of 27 countries on this measure, in the top 10%.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Poland, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers in Poland, 2008 to 2019.
Year Value Change
2008 27.7%
2009 47.9% +72.8%
2010 38.5% -19.6%
2011 42.0% +9.2%
2012 38.4% -8.7%
2015 28.4% -26.1%
2016 20.3% -28.6%
2017 17.9% -11.4%
2019 16,763.7% +93317.6%

Poland compared with similar countries

  • Poland's 16,763.7% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 50.5%, 332.2× the median. (8 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 37.8% 27.7% 47.9% 2
2010s 2,421.3% 17.9% 16,763.7% 7

Countries ranked near Poland

  1. 2 Armenia 67.0% compare
  2. 3 Kyrgyzstan 62.3% compare
  3. 4 Pakistan 61.1% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Poland

All data for Poland →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Poland?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Poland was 16,763.7% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Poland?
The highest recorded value was 16,763.7% in 2019.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Poland?
The lowest recorded value was 17.9% in 2017.
How does Poland rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
Poland ranks 1st out of 27 countries with data for 2019.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international rising or falling in Poland?
Over the last ten years it is up 34,924.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is volatile.
Where does this Poland data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 9 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Poland. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/poland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/poland/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Poland</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group