Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo

Kosovo: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International was 49.7% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
49.7%
World rank
6th
of 27 countries
All-time high
82.7%
in 2006
All-time low
36.6%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo, 2006–2017

0204060802006201120172006: 82.72011: 68.42012: 43.12013: 36.62017: 49.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kosovo is 49.7%, measured in 2017.

The figure is down 39.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kosovo peaked at 82.7% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 36.6%, in 2013.

That places Kosovo 6th out of 27 countries with data for 2017, putting it in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers in Kosovo, 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 82.7%
2011 68.4% -17.4%
2012 43.1% -36.9%
2013 36.6% -15.1%
2017 49.7% +35.7%

Kosovo compared with similar countries

  • Kosovo's 49.7% is below the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 50.5%, 98% of the median. (8 countries reporting)
  • Kosovo's 49.7% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 23.5%, 2.1× the median. (17 countries reporting)

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 82.7% 82.7% 82.7% 1
2010s 49.4% 36.6% 68.4% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo

  1. 3 Kyrgyzstan 62.3% compare
  2. 4 Pakistan 61.1% compare
  3. 5 Republic of Moldova 51.2% compare
  4. 6 Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) 49.7% compare
  5. 8 Mongolia 49.6% compare
  6. 9 Georgia 46.0% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo

All data for Kosovo →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kosovo?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kosovo was 49.7% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Kosovo?
The highest recorded value was 82.7% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Kosovo?
The lowest recorded value was 36.6% in 2013.
How does Kosovo rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
Kosovo ranks 6th out of 27 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international rising or falling in Kosovo?
Over the last ten years it is down 39.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/kosovo/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/kosovo/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group