Kosovo vs Kyrgyzstan: Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International
Kosovo
49.7%
in 2017
Kyrgyzstan
62.3%
in 2020
Kosovo rank
6th
Kyrgyzstan rank
3rd
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International over time
- Kosovo
- Kyrgyzstan
How they compare
Kyrgyzstan currently reports 62.3% against 49.7% in Kosovo, a difference of 12.6%.
That makes Kyrgyzstan's figure about 1.3 times Kosovo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 5 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Kosovo ahead.
Kosovo ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
Kosovo has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kosovo | Kyrgyzstan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 82.7% | 47.3% | 35.5% | Kosovo |
| 2010s | 49.4% | 48.7% | 0.7% | Kosovo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international, Kosovo or Kyrgyzstan?
- Kyrgyzstan, at 62.3% against 49.7% in Kosovo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international between Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 12.6%, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan?
- 5 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2017.
- How do Kosovo and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
- Kosovo ranks 6th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 3rd of 27 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- ASPIRE, published as Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group