Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244): Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International was 49.7% in 2017. ▼ Falling

Latest (2017)
49.7%
World rank
6th
of 27 countries
All-time high
82.7%
in 2006
All-time low
36.6%
in 2013
Years of data
5
2006–2017

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006–2017

0204060802006201120172006: 82.72011: 68.42012: 43.12013: 36.62017: 49.7

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) is 49.7%, measured in 2017.

That represents a change of down 39.9% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) peaked at 82.7% in 2006 and was at its lowest, 36.6%, in 2013.

Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 6th of 27 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244), 2006 to 2017.
Year Value Change
2006 82.7%
2011 68.4% -17.4%
2012 43.1% -36.9%
2013 36.6% -15.1%
2017 49.7% +35.7%

Averages by decade

DecadeAverage LowestHighest Years
2000s 82.7% 82.7% 82.7% 1
2010s 49.4% 36.6% 68.4% 4

Countries ranked near Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

  1. 3 Kyrgyzstan 62.3% compare
  2. 4 Pakistan 61.1% compare
  3. 5 Republic of Moldova 51.2% compare
  4. 6 Kosovo 49.7% compare
  5. 8 Mongolia 49.6% compare
  6. 9 Georgia 46.0% compare

See the full ranking of 27 places →

More work & labour data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)

All data for Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) was 49.7% in 2017, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The highest recorded value was 82.7% in 2006.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international recorded in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
The lowest recorded value was 36.6% in 2013.
How does Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) rank for adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international?
Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) ranks 6th out of 27 countries with data for 2017.
Is adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - international rising or falling in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)?
Over the last ten years it is down 39.9%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Kosovo (UNSCR 1244) data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244). Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/kosovo-unscr-1244/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-5th-quintile-richest-percent-international-private-transfers/kosovo-unscr-1244/">Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International in Kosovo (UNSCR 1244)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 5th quintile (richest) (%) - International Private Transfers
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
27 places, 266 data points, 2003–2022
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group