Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Honduras
Honduras: Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers was 26.1% in 2019. ▲ Rising
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Honduras, 2008–2019
Source: ASPIRE.
Analysis
The most recent figure for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Honduras is 26.1%, measured in 2019.
That represents a change of up 22.4% on the previous year and up 14.4% over ten years.
Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Honduras peaked at 31.3% in 2017 and was at its lowest, 20.8%, in 2011.
That places Honduras 8th out of 30 countries with data for 2019, putting it in the top quarter.
The long-run direction has been consistently rising across the 10 years of available data.
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Honduras, year by year
| Year | Value | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2008 | 22.2% | — |
| 2009 | 22.8% | +2.8% |
| 2010 | 22.5% | -1.6% |
| 2011 | 20.8% | -7.5% |
| 2013 | 24.3% | +16.8% |
| 2015 | 28.8% | +18.8% |
| 2016 | 23.1% | -19.9% |
| 2017 | 31.3% | +35.7% |
| 2018 | 21.4% | -31.9% |
| 2019 | 26.1% | +22.4% |
Honduras compared with similar countries
- Honduras's 26.1% is above the median for Latin America & Caribbean, which is 17.1%, 1.5× the median. (14 countries reporting)
Averages by decade
| Decade | Average | Lowest | Highest | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 22.5% | 22.2% | 22.8% | 2 |
| 2010s | 24.8% | 20.8% | 31.3% | 8 |
Countries ranked near Honduras
- 5 Republic of Moldova 38.4% compare
- 6 Romania 34.5% compare
- 7 Sri Lanka 31.7% compare
- 9 Paraguay 26.1% compare
- 10 Dominican Republic 24.6% compare
- 11 Costa Rica 24.5% compare
More work & labour data for Honduras
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes, annual -0.1079 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male, annual growth -0.0917 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female, annual growth -0.1244 % change on previous year (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population, annual growth rate -1.03 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population, annual growth rate 1.17 % change on previous year (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Urban population 9,793 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Rural population 3,456 1000 No (2050)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Female 8,495 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Male 8,535 1000 No (2100)
- Population - Est. & Proj. — Total Population - Both sexes 17,030 1000 No (2100)
Frequently asked questions
- What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Honduras?
- Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Honduras was 26.1% in 2019, according to ASPIRE.
- What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Honduras?
- The highest recorded value was 31.3% in 2017.
- What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Honduras?
- The lowest recorded value was 20.8% in 2011.
- How does Honduras rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
- Honduras ranks 8th out of 30 countries with data for 2019.
- Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Honduras?
- Over the last ten years it is up 14.4%. The long-run trend across the full record is rising.
- Where does this Honduras data come from?
- The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.
Download this data
CSV · JSON — 10 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).
About this data
Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group