Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 3rd Domestic rural in Moldova

Moldova: Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 3rd Domestic rural was 38.4% in 2018. ▼ Falling

Latest (2018)
38.4%
Change on year
up 19.5%
World rank
5th
of 30 countries
All-time high
50.9%
in 2012
All-time low
29.9%
in 2010
Years of data
5
2010–2018

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova, 2010–2018

02040602010201420182010: 29.92012: 50.92013: 47.42017: 32.12018: 38.4

Source: ASPIRE.

Analysis

Moldova recorded 38.4% for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in 2018.

Compared with earlier readings it is up 19.5% on the previous year and up 28.5% over ten years.

Over the whole period, adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova peaked at 50.9% in 2012 and was at its lowest, 29.9%, in 2010.

Moldova ranks 5th of 30 countries on this measure, in the top quarter.

Adequacy of benefits: Domestic Private … 3rd Domestic rural in Moldova, year by year

Annual values for Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural in Moldova, 2010 to 2018.
Year Value Change
2010 29.9% —
2012 50.9% +70.6%
2013 47.4% -6.8%
2017 32.1% -32.3%
2018 38.4% +19.5%

Moldova compared with similar countries

  • Moldova's 38.4% is above the median for Europe & Central Asia, which is 17.0%, 2.3× the median. (9 countries reporting)
  • Moldova's 38.4% is above the median for upper middle income countries, which is 17.3%, 2.2× the median. (18 countries reporting)

Countries ranked near Moldova

  1. 2 Vietnam 56.6% compare
  2. 3 Thailand 44.0% compare
  3. 4 Kyrgyzstan 42.4% compare
  4. 6 Romania 34.5% compare
  5. 7 Sri Lanka 31.7% compare
  6. 8 Honduras 26.1% compare

See the full ranking of 30 places →

More work & labour data for Moldova

All data for Moldova →

Frequently asked questions

What is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova?
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers in Moldova was 38.4% in 2018, according to ASPIRE.
What is the highest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Moldova?
The highest recorded value was 50.9% in 2012.
What is the lowest adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers recorded in Moldova?
The lowest recorded value was 29.9% in 2010.
How does Moldova rank for adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers?
Moldova ranks 5th out of 30 countries with data for 2018.
Is adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - domestic private transfers rising or falling in Moldova?
Over the last ten years it is up 28.5%. The long-run trend across the full record is falling.
Where does this Moldova data come from?
The figures come from ASPIRE, published as part of Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural. Statizoid updates them automatically from the source API.

Download this data

CSV · JSON — 5 observations, free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data).

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova. Statizoid, drawing on ASPIRE. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/moldova/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://labour.statizoid.com/stat/adequacy-of-benefits-in-3rd-quintile-percent-domestic-private-transfers-rural/moldova/">Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers in Moldova</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Adequacy of benefits in 3rd quintile (%) - Domestic Private Transfers -rural
Source
ASPIRE
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
30 places, 295 data points, 2003–2023
Last refreshed

Total transfer amount received by all beneficiaries in a population group as a share of the total welfare of beneficiaries in that group